4.4 Article

Flipping the Classroom to Improve Learning With MOOCs Technology

Journal

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 15-25

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cae.21774

Keywords

MOOCs; data analysis; evaluation; distance learning; flipping the classroom; learning analytics; SPOCs

Funding

  1. eMadrid project (Regional Government of Madrid) [S2013/ICE-2715]
  2. RESET project (Ministry of Economy and Competiveness) [TIN2014-53199-C3-1-R]
  3. IRENE project (Ministry of Economy and Competiveness) [PT-2012-1036-370000]
  4. European Erasmus+ SHEILA project [562080-EPP-1-2015-BE-EPPKA3-PI-FORWARD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is increasing worldwide and brings a revolution in education. The application of MOOCs has technological but also pedagogical implications. MOOCs are usually driven by short video lessons, automatic correction exercises, and the technological platforms can implement gamification or learning analytics techniques. However, much more analysis is required about the success or failure of these initiatives in order to know if this new MOOCs paradigm is appropriate for different learning situations. This work aims at analyzing and reporting whether the introduction of MOOCs technology was good or not in a case study with the Khan Academy platform at our university with students in a remedial Physics course in engineering education. Results show that students improved their grades significantly when using MOOCs technology, student satisfaction was high regarding the experience and for most of the different provided features, and there were good levels of interaction with the platform (e.g., number of completed videos or proficient exercises), and also the activity distribution for the different topics and types of activities was appropriate. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available