4.7 Article

Higher tea consumption is associated with decreased risk of small vessel stroke

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 1430-1435

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.039

Keywords

Tea consumption; Mendelian randomization; Stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study using a genetic approach found a causal association between an extra daily cup of tea consumption and reduced risk of small vessel stroke. No significant association was observed with other stroke subtypes.
Background & aim: Observational studies have reported that tea consumption is associated with risk of stroke. However, this observed association is inconsistent, and whether this observed association is due to confounding factors or reverse causation remains unclear. Thus, we applied a two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) approach to determine whether genetically predicted tea consumption is causally associated with risk of stroke, ischemic stroke (IS), and IS subtypes. Methods: UK Biobank available data (349,376 samples of European ancestry) was used to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with tea consumption (cups/day). The summary statistics for stroke, IS, and IS subtypes were obtained from the MEGASTROKE consortium with 40,585 stroke cases and 406,111 controls. Results: We found that genetically predicted an extra daily cup of tea consumption was casually associated with a reduced risk of small vessel stroke (odds ratio (OR), 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-0.91; P = 0.001), but not with cardioembolic stroke (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09; P = 0.582), large artery stroke (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; P = 0.506), stroke (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.06; P = 0.889) or IS (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.01; P = 0.083). Conclusions: Our study provided evidence that genetically predicted an extra daily cup of tea consumption is causally associated with a reduced risk of small vessel stroke. 0 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available