4.7 Article

Malnutrition and nutritional therapy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 disease

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 1330-1337

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.021

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Malnutrition; Nutritional therapy; NRS-20 02; GLIM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the prevalence of malnutrition and nutritional therapy provided to COVID-19 patients in a hospital in Italy. Results showed that most patients were at nutritional risk and half were malnourished, with differences in nutritional status and care intensity settings. Energy and protein intake were below recommended levels, highlighting the need for improved nutritional care practices.
Rationale: The prevalence of malnutrition and the provided nutritional therapy were evaluated in all the patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) hospitalized in a 3rd level hospital in Italy. Methods: A one-day audit was carried out recording: age, measured or estimated body weight (BW) and height, body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)), 30-day weight loss (WL), comorbidities, serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP: nv < 0.5 mg/dL), hospital diet (HD) intake, oral nutritional supplements (ONS), enteral (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN). Modified NRS-20 02 tool and GLIM criteria were used for nutritional risk screening and for the diagnosis of malnutrition, respectively. Results: A total of 268 patients was evaluated; intermediate care units (IMCUs, 61%), sub-intensive care units (SICUs, 8%), intensive care units (ICUs, 17%) and rehabilitation units (RUs, 14%): BMI: <18.5, 9% (higher in RUs, p = 0.008) and >30, 13% (higher in ICUs, p = 0.012); WL > 5%, 52% (higher in ICUs and RUs, p = 0.001); CRP >0.5: 78% (higher in ICUs and lower in RUs, p < 0.001); Nutritional risk and malnutrition were present in 77% (higher in ICUs and RUs, p < 0.001) and 50% (higher in ICUs, p = 0.0792) of the patients, respectively. HD intake <50%, 39% (higher in IMCUs and ICUs, p < 0.001); ONS, EN and PN were prescribed to 6%, 13% and 5%, respectively. Median energy and protein intake/kg BW were 25 kcal and 1.1 g (both lower in ICUs, p < 0.05) respectively. Conclusions: Most of the patients were at nutritional risk, and one-half of them was malnourished. The frequency of nutritional risk, malnutrition, disease/inflammation burden and decrease intake of HD differed among the intensity of care settings, where the patients were managed according to the severity of the disease. The patient energy and protein intake were at the lowest limit or below the recommended amounts, indicating the need for actions to improve the nutritional care practice. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available