4.3 Article

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB): CT and MRI appearance with radiology-pathology correlation

Journal

CLINICAL IMAGING
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 10-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.036

Keywords

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct; Premalignant; Extra hepatic polypoidal mass; Frond-like; Plaque-like stricture; Cholangiocarcinoma

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [K08CA234222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a precursor to invasive carcinoma and is a distinct pathologic diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate imaging features of IPNB on cross-sectional imaging studies with histopathologic correlation. Materials and methods: In this IRB approved, HIPAA compliant retrospective observational analysis of 23 pathology proven IPNB tumors 22 imaging studies were reviewed, 14 CT and 8 MRI scans. Features evaluated in consensus by two subspecialty-trained abdominal radiologists included: presence of specific lesion/mass within the bile duct, location within the biliary tree, size, morphology, enhancement characteristics, and bile duct caliber. Results: Majority of the subjects (16/18, 90%) had definite intraluminal mass, of which 7 (39%) had a polypoid mass with upstream diffuse biliary ductal dilation and 5 (28%) had a plaque-like mass with focal stricture and upstream biliary ductal dilatation. 6/18 (33%) subjects had low grade dysplasia, most commonly intestinal subtype, 7/18 (39%) subjects presented with invasive component, commonly pancreaticobiliary subtype, and 5/18 (28%) presented with high grade dysplasia. Conclusion: IPNB has increased predilection for extrahepatic bile ducts, commonly presenting as either an intraluminal polypoidal mass with associated upstream biliary ductal dilation or a focal plaque like mass with associated ductal stricture at the site of the tumor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available