4.7 Article

Provider Attitudes Toward Risk-Based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 183-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.015

Keywords

Liver Cancer; Screening; Ultrasound; Computed Tomography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32DK007742, T32DK007534]
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute [R01CA196692]
  3. VA CSRD grant [I01CX001156]
  4. NIH/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K24AA022523]
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/NIH [UL1TR002319, KL2TR002317, TL1TR002318]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The survey found that the majority of providers support semi-annual HCC surveillance, with a preference for ultrasound combined with alpha fetoprotein testing. Barriers to surveillance include limited treatment options, screening test effectiveness, transportation access, and high costs.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance rates are suboptimal in clinical practice. We aimed to elicit providers' opinions on the following aspects of HCC surveillance: preferred strategies, barriers and facilitators, and the impact of a patient's HCC risk on the choice of surveillance modality. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey among gastroenterology and hepatology providers (40% faculty physicians, 21% advanced practice providers, 39% fellow-trainees) from 26 US medical centers in 17 states. RESULTS: Of 654 eligible providers, 305 (47%) completed the survey. Nearly all (98.4%) of the providers endorsed semi-annual HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis, with 84.2% recommending ultrasound +/- alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and 15.4% recommending computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Barriers to surveillance included limited HCC treatment options, screening test effectiveness to reduce mortality, access to transportation, and high out-of-pocket costs. Facilitators of surveillance included professional society guidelines. Most providers (72.1%) would perform surveillance even if HCC risk was low (<= 0.5% per year), while 98.7% would perform surveillance if HCC risk was >= 1% per year. As a patient's HCC risk increased from 1% to 3% to 5% per year, providers reported they would be less likely to order ultrasound +/- AFP (83.6% to 68.9% to 57.4%; P < .001) and more likely to order CT or MRI +/- AFP (3.9% to 26.2% to 36.1%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Providers recommend HCC surveillance even when HCC risk is much lower than the threshold suggested by professional societies. Many appear receptive to risk-based HCC surveillance strategies that depend on patients' estimated HCC risk, instead of our current one-size-fits all strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available