4.7 Article

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Romidepsin in Patients with Cancer and Hepatic Dysfunction: A National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 20, Pages 5329-5337

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1412

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network [U01CA062487, U01CA062502, U01CA062505, U01CA069912, U01CA070095, U01CA132123, UM1CA186644, UM1CA186686, UM1CA186689, UM1CA186691, UM1CA186717, U24CA247648]
  2. Analytical Pharmacology Core of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (NIH) [P30 CA006973, UL1 TR 001079]
  3. Shared Instrument Grant [S10RR026824-01]
  4. Clinical Protocol and Data Management facilities [P30 CA006973]
  5. Biostatistics Shared Resource of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins [P30 CA006973]
  6. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the NIH [UL1 TR 001079]
  7. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [UL1 TR 001079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Romidepsin dosing recommendations for patients with malignancy and varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction was lacking at the time of regulatory approval for T-cell lymphoma. We conducted a multicenter phase I clinical trial (ETCTN-9008) via the NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group to investigate safety, first cycle MTD, and pharmacokinetic profile of romidepsin in this setting. Patients and Methods: Patientswith select advanced solid tumors or hematologic malignancies were stratified according to hepatic function. Romidepsin was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and escalation followed a 3 thorn 3 design in moderate and severe impairment cohorts. Blood samples for detailed pharmacokinetic analyses were collected after the first dose. Results: Thirty-one patients received one dose of romidepsin and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analyses in normal (n = 12), mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 5), and severe (n = 6) cohorts. Adverse events across cohorts were similar, and dose-limiting toxicity occurred in two patients (mild and severe impairment cohorts). The MTD was not determined because the geometric mean AUC values of romidepsin in moderate (7 mg/m(2)) and severe (5 mg/m(2)) impairment cohort were 114% and 116% of the normal cohort (14 mg/m(2)). Conclusions: Data from the ETCTN-9008 trial led to changes in the romidepsin labeling to reflect starting dose adjustment for patients with cancer and moderate and severe hepatic impairment, with no adjustment for mild hepatic impairment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available