4.3 Article

nextMONARCH: Abemaciclib Monotherapy or Combined With Tamoxifen for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 181-+

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.09.011

Keywords

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6; Endocrine therapy; HER2(-); Hormone receptor-positive; MBC

Categories

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abemaciclib showed single-agent activity in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Adding tamoxifen did not significantly improve progression-free survival or objective response rate compared to abemaciclib monotherapy.
nextMONARCH investigated abemaciclib monotherapy and abemaciclib combined with tamoxifen. Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with abemaciclib (with or without prophylactic loperamide) and combined with tamoxifen for endocrine refractory MBC after chemotherapy. The results confirmed the single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC. Background: Abemaciclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor administered continuously for hormone receptor-positive (HR*), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2(-)) advanced breast cancer. Abemaciclib is associated with dose-dependent early-onset diarrhea. nextMONARCH evaluated abemaciclib monotherapy (with or without prophylactic loperamide) and combined with tamoxifen for endocrine refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: nextMONARCH is an open-label, controlled, randomized, phase II study of women with endocrine-refractory HR+, HER2(-) MBC previously treated with chemoherapy. Patients received abemaciclib 150 mg plus tamoxifen 20 mg (A+T), abemaciclib 150 mg every 12 hours (A-150), or abemaciclib 200 mg plus prophylactic loperamide (A-200). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). PFS analyses tested superiority of A+T to A-200 and informal noninferiority of A-150 to A-200. The secondary objectives included the objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: The median PFS was 9.1 months for A+T versus 7.4 months for A-200 (hazard ratio, 0.815; 95% confidence interval, 0.556-1.193; P = .293). The A-200 PFS was comparable to that with A-150 at 6.5 months (hazard ratio, 1.045; 95% confidence nterval, 0.711-1.535; P = .811). The ORR was 34.6%, 24.1%, and 32.5% for A+T, A-150, and A-200, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The incidence and severity of diarrhea (62.3%; grade 3, 7.8%) with A-200 was similar to that with A-150 (67.1%; grade 3, 3.8%). The pharmacokinetics were comparable to previous observations. Conclusions: The addition of tamoxifen to abemaciclib did not significantly improve PFS or ORR compared with abemaciclib monotherapy but confirmed the single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated HR+, HER2(-) MBC. Dose reductions and antidiarrheal medication generally managed diarrhea while maintaining efficacy. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available