4.4 Article

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

Journal

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Volume 37, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/abb14e

Keywords

gravitational waves; LIGO calibration; systematic error; interferometry; general relativity; data analysis; astrophysics

Funding

  1. United States National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-1764464]
  2. LSC Fellows program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  4. NSF [PHY-1921006, PHY-1841480, PHY-1607178, PHY-1847350]
  5. ARC Center of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav) [CE170100004]
  6. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion
  7. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [FPA2016-76821-P]
  8. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme del Govern de les Illes Balears [FPI-CAIB FPI/2134/2018]
  9. Fons Social Europeu 2014-2020 de les Illes Balears
  10. European Union FEDER funds
  11. EU COST actions [CA16104, CA16214, CA17137, CA18108]
  12. [PHY-0823459]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be <7% in magnitude and <4 deg in phase (68% confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of <2% in magnitude and <2 deg in phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available