4.5 Article

Stress-Structure Relationship of the Reversible Associating Polymer Network under Start-up Shear Flow

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 387-396

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-020-2487-6

Keywords

Associating polymer; Start-up shear; Stress-structure relationship

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21873092, 21774127, 21790341, 21790342]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDY-SSW-SLH027]
  3. Jilin Provincial science and technology development program [20190103115JH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stress-structure relationship of telechelic reversible associating polymer gel shows significant variations under different shear strengths, exhibiting distinct stress-strain curve characteristics.
We adopt Langevin dynamics to explore the stress-structure relationship of telechelic reversible associating polymer gel during startup shear flow, with shear strengths varying fromW(i)= 12.6 toW(i)= 12640. At weak shear flowW(i)= 12.6, the shear stress proportionally increases with shear strain at short times, followed by a strain hardening behavior and then passes through a maximum (sigma(max),gamma(max)) and finally decreases until it reaches the steady state. During the evolution of stress, the gel network is only slightly broken and essentially maintains its framework, and the strain hardening behavior originates from the excessive stretching of chains. On the other hand, the stress-strain curve at intermediate shear flowW(i)= 505.6 shows two differences from that atW(i)= 12.6, namely, the absence of strain hardening and a dramatic increase of stress at large strains, which is caused by the rupture of gel network at small strains and the network recovery at large strains, respectively. Finally, at very strong shear flowW(i)= 6319.7, the gel network is immediately broken by shear flow and the stress-strain curve exhibits similar behaviors to those of classical polymeric liquids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available