4.7 Review

Substitution of petroleum-based polymeric materials used in the electrospinning process with nanocellulose: A review and future outlook

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128710

Keywords

Nanocellulose; Natural polymer electrospinning; Cellulose nanofibrils; Cellulose nanocrystals

Funding

  1. Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Council (BAP) [MGA-2017-40885]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineered composites commonly use fibrous reinforcing materials such as carbon fiber and glass fiber, but there is growing interest in biobased materials like plant fibers. Nanocelluloses, projected to be cheaper and potentially produce in great quantities, have garnered particular interest recently.
The most fibrous reinforcing materials for engineered composites (e.g. carbon fiber, glass fiber) are solid fibers or loops, garments, and their preforms. In design and fabrication methods, the fiber orientation and design can therefore be regulated broadly. The continuous fibers from biobased materials such as plants are nevertheless growing interest. Nanocelluloses, which are projected to be cheaper than many other nanomaterials and potentially produce in great quantities, are of particular interest recently. They have an impressive strength to weight ratio and have so far demonstrated no care in their unmodified condition with respect to the climate, health and safety. The efficient and effective use of nanocellulose in continuous fibers is, however, difficult and a range of approaches have been studied where either directly or in combination with the polymers spin nanocellulose dispersions. In this study, a variety of approaches are reviewed and a perspective is provided to better understand the body of knowledge in this new and increasing area. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available