4.7 Article

Comparison of AOPs at pilot scale: Energy costs for micro-pollutants oxidation, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128527

Keywords

Emerging contaminants; Ozone; UV/Chlorine; Nitrosamine; Bromate; Water reuse

Funding

  1. University of Catania within the Piano di incentivi per la Ricerca di Ateneo 2020/2022 of the Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Project Materiali e Metodologie chimico-fisiche avanzate per l'abbattimento di contaminanti Xenobiotici (MaMe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research found that ozonation is the most energy efficient AOP process, while UV irradiation is the most effective method for wastewater disinfection. UV irradiation can effectively inactivate indicator organisms such as Escherichia coli, but is less effective against enterococci.
This work evaluated different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) operated at pilot-scale as tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater in terms of energy efficiency, disinfection by-products formation and pathogens inactivation. Investigated AOPs included UV/H2O2, UV/Cl-2, O-3, O-3/UV, H2O2/O-3/UV, Cl-2/O-3/UV. AOPs were operated using various ozone doses (1.5-9 mg L-1), and UV fluences (191-981 mJ cm(-2)). Electrical energy costs necessary for the oxidation of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) (i.e., carbamazepine, fluoxetine, gemfibrozil, primidone, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) were calculated using the electrical energy per order (E-EO) parameter. Ozonation resulted by far the most energy efficient process, whereas UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl-2 showed the highest energy costs. Energy costs for AOPs based on the combination of UV and ozone were in the order O-3/UV approximate to Cl-2/O-3/UV > H2O2/O-3/UV, and they were significantly lower than energy costs of UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl-2 processes. Cl-2/O-3/UV increased bromate formation, O-3/UV and O-3 had same levels of bromate formation, whereas H2O2/O-3/UV did not form bromate. In addition, UV photolysis resulted an effective treatment for NDMA mitigation even in combination with ozone and chlorine in AOP technologies. Ozonation (doses of 1.5-6 mg L-1) was the least effective process to inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli, and enterococci. UV irradiation was able to completely inactivate somatic coliphages, total coliform, escherichia coli at low fluence (191 mJ cm(-2)), whereas enterococci were UV resistant. AOPs that utilized UV irradiation were the most effective processes for wastewater disinfection resulting in a complete inactivation of selected indicator organisms by low ozone dose (1.5 mg L-1) and UV fluence (191-465 mJ cm(-2)). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available