4.7 Article

Indoor generated PM2.5 compositions and volatile organic compounds: Potential sources and health risk implications

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126932

Keywords

Indoor air quality; Particulate matter; BTEX; Heavy metals; Human toxicity

Funding

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [DIP-2019-001, MI-2020-005, KRA-2018-054]
  2. Ministry of Education Malaysia [FRGS/1/2018/WAB05/UKM/02/2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential sources of heavy metals in fine air particles (PM2.5) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and isomeric xylenes (BTEX) in gas phase indoor air. PM2.5 samples were collected using a low volume sampler. BTEX samples were collected using passive sampling onto sorbent tubes and analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). For the lower and upper floors of the evaluated building, the concentrations of PM2.5 were 96.4 +/- 2.70 mu g/m(3) and 80.2 +/- 3.11 mu g/m(3), respectively. The compositions of heavy metals in PM2.5 were predominated by iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and aluminum (Al) with concentration of 500 +/- 50.07 ng/m(3), 466 +/- 77.38 ng/m(3), and 422 +/- 147.38 ng/m(3). A principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the main sources of BTEX were originated from vehicle emissions and exacerbate because of temperature variations. Hazard quotient results for BTEX showed that the compounds were below acceptable limits and thus did not possess potential carcinogenic risks. However, a measured output of lifetime cancer probability revealed that benzene and ethylbenzene posed definite carcinogenic risks. Pollutants that originated from heavy traffic next to the sampling site contributed to the indoor pollution. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available