4.7 Article

Combined effect of physicochemical factors on the retention and transport of g-C3N4 in porous media

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127100

Keywords

g-C3N4; Transport; Porous media; Combined effect; Physicochemical factors

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0900805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41907160]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [B200202098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environmental behaviors of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) have drawn increasing attention in recent. Understanding the fate and transport of g-C3N4 in porous media is necessary for evaluating its environmental risks. Column experiments were used in this study to investigate the combined effect of ionic strength (IS) and other common physicochemical factors (i.e. sand grain size, solution pH, and humic acid concentration) on g-C3N4 transport. The one-site kinetic models were applied to simulate the retention and transport of g-C3N4 in porous media, which fitted the breakthrough curves very well. Experimental and model results showed that g-C3N4 had a weak mobility with the transport mass recovery (TMR) less than 39.6% at pH 6.0 in absence of humic acid (HA). The mobility of g-C3N4 was inhibited with decreasing sand grain size, and the inhibited efficiency was enhanced with IS. However, g-C3N4 transport was significantly enhanced with increasing pH and HA concentration, and the enhanced efficiency was more obviously at high IS. The maximum TMR (78.3%) of g-C3N4 was observed with the presence of 5 mg L-1 HA. These results indicated that physicochemical factors played an important and combined role in controlling g-C3N4 transport in porous media, which would lead to the more complex evaluation on the environmental behaviors of g-C3N4. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available