4.7 Article

A robust electrospun separator modified with in situ grown metal-organic frameworks for lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 395, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124979

Keywords

Novel separator; Metal-organic framework; Low pressure chemical vapor deposition; Shuttle effect; Lithium-sulfur batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702247, 51832004, 51521001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202603, 2018YFB0104200]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B17034]
  4. Yellow Crane Talent (Science & Technology) Program of Wuhan City
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2019III174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the existence of the soluble lithium polysulfides, the requirement for an ideal separator for lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries is higher than that in LIBs. Herein, we report a double-layered MOF-PAN/rGO-PAN nanofiber membrane as an alternative to commercial polyolefin separators for Li-S battery. This PAN-based membrane possesses the intrinsic advantages of good mechanical property, thermal stability and high electrolyte uptake, showing a high lithium ion transference number of 0.81. The in situ grown MOF particles by low pressure chemical vapor deposition attach on the surface of the nanofibers tightly, and these exposed particles can maximize the utilization for trapping polysulfides through chemisorption. With this novel functional separator, the Li-S batteries can provide a high initial capacity of 1302 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 C. At a high rate of 5 C, the capacity decay rate is only 0.03% per cycle over 600 cycles. More importantly, even with a high sulfur loading of 7.7 mg cm(-2), the Li-S battery is able to deliver a high areal capacity of 7.8 mAh cm(-2) after 50 cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available