4.7 Article

Influence of MCO3 (M=Ca, Sr, Ba)-doping on the non-ohmic properties of the ceramic varistor system SnO2-Co3O4-Cr2O3-Nb2O5

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 4006-4011

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.267

Keywords

Tin dioxide; Varistors; Electrical properties; X-ray diffraction

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Council of Mexico (CONACYT) [A1-S-16392]
  2. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon [PAICYT-2020: IT1391-20]
  3. CONACYT-Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the influence of adding calcium, strontium, and barium carbonates on the microstructure and electrical properties of a ceramic varistor system, with the SrCO3-doped sample showing the highest non-linear coefficient.
In this study, the influence of the addition of calcium, strontium and barium carbonates on the microstructure and the electrical properties of the SnO2-Co3O4-Cr2O3-Nb2O5 ceramic varistor system was investigated. The powder mixtures were previously studied by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry showing the decomposition of carbonates into CaO, SrO, and BaO below 1000 degrees C. Then, green tablets were obtained and sintered at 1350 degrees C for 1 h under an ambient atmosphere. Later characterization by X-ray diffraction demonstrates a systematic increase on the lattice parameters as CaCO3 SrCO3, and BaCO3 were added. Scanning Electron Microscopy reveals a decreasing tendency for the average grain size. The electrical performance was evaluated in terms of electrical breakdown field (E-b) and non-linear coefficient (alpha). Although all the samples exhibited non-ohmic electrical behavior, the SrCO3-doped ceramic showed the highest non-linear coefficient (alpha = 10) compared to those doped with CaCO3 or BaCO3. A defect model is proposed to explain the way that Ca2+, Sr2+, or Ba2+ incorporates into SnO2 lattice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available