4.7 Article

Application of a negative thermal expansion oxide in SOFC cathode

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 1095-1100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.225

Keywords

SOFCs; NTE oxides; Cathodes; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974316, 51371160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The addition of negative thermal expansion oxide in the cathode of solid oxide fuel cells can significantly improve their electrochemical performance, leading to a substantial increase in peak power density and a decrease in relative increment between 500-750 degrees Celsius.
To improve the performance of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) at intermediate temperature, an idea of adding a negative thermal expansion (NTE) oxide into cathode is proposed. The effects of NdMnO3-delta (NM) NTE oxide addition in Ba0.5Sr0.5FeO3-delta (BSF) cathode on the performance of proton-conducting SOFCs (H-SOFCs) are studied. The 30 wt % NM addition can lead to an ideal thermal matching between BSF-NM cathode and BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3-delta (BZCY) electrolyte, and improve the electrochemical performance of H-SOFCs significantly. At 500-750 degrees C, the peak power density (PPD) of H-SOFCs with BSF-NM cathode is 139-941 mW cm(-2), which is apparently higher than that (73-661 mW cm(-2)) with BSF one. In addition, the relative increment of peak power density (PPD) increases from 42.36% at 750 degrees C to 90.41% at 500 degrees C, which is seldom obtained by conventional cathode doping. Comprehensive results of electrochemical impedance spectra, electrical conductivities, and SEM observations show that the apparent improvement of PPDs should be mainly associated with the increased three phase boundary length due to the ideal thermal matching between cathodes and electrolytes. In all, it provides a novel idea to develop intermediate and low temperature SOFCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available