4.8 Review

Clinical detection of neurodegenerative blood biomarkers using graphene immunosensor

Journal

CARBON
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 144-162

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.048

Keywords

Graphene; Clinical detection; Neurodegenerative disease; Protein biomarkers; Immunosensor

Funding

  1. Edmond J. Safra Foundation
  2. UK Dementia Research Institute from UK DRI Ltd - UK Medical Research Council
  3. UK EPSRC [EP/P012779]
  4. UK Dementia Research Institute from UK DRI Ltd - Alzheimer's Society
  5. UK Dementia Research Institute from UK DRI Ltd - Alzheimer's Research UK
  6. EPSRC [EP/P012779/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [UKDRI-7006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate detection of blood biomarkers related to neurodegenerative diseases could provide a shortcut to identifying early stage patients before the onset of symptoms. The specificity, selectivity and operational requirements of the current technologies, however, preclude their use in the primary clinical setting for early detection. Graphene, an emerging 2D nanomaterial, is a promising candidate for biosensing which has the potential to meet the performance requirements and enable cost-effective, portable and rapid diagnosis. In this review, we compare graphene-based immunosensing technologies with conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and cutting-edge single molecule array techniques for the detection of blood-based neurodegenerative biomarkers. We cover the progress in electrical, electrochemical and optical graphene-based immunosensors and outline the barriers that slow or prevent the adoption of this emerging technology in primary clinical settings. We also highlight the possible solutions to overcome these barriers with an outlook on the future of the promising, graphene immunosensor technology. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available