4.2 Review

Novel Therapeutic Approaches and the Evolution of Drug Development in Advanced Kidney Cancer

Journal

CANCER JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 464-470

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000477

Keywords

Hypoxia-inducible factor; immune checkpoints; non-clear cell; novel therapies

Categories

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Alexion
  3. Bayer
  4. Bristol Myers-Squibb/ER Squibb
  5. Sons LLC
  6. Cerulean
  7. Eisai
  8. Foundation Medicine Inc.
  9. Exelixis
  10. Ipsen
  11. Tracon
  12. Genentech
  13. Roche
  14. Roche Products Ltd.
  15. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Lilly
  18. Merck
  19. Novartis
  20. Peloton
  21. Pfizer
  22. Prometheus Labs
  23. Corvus
  24. Calithera
  25. Analysis Group
  26. Sanofi/Aventis
  27. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Therapies currently approved in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and inhibitors of mTOR signaling. Increased understanding of the biology of clear cell and non-clear cell RCC has led to development of agents that target hypoxia-inducible factor 2 and MET, while there is ongoing exploration of targeting immune pathways other than the programmed death ligand 1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 checkpoints. Drug development in RCC is moving toward the study of combination therapies and attempting to use a risk-adapted approach in treatment. While the past decade has seen the approval of several new therapies, there is an urgent need to focus drug development on novel targets and expand the therapeutic armamentarium in both clear cell and non-clear cell kidney cancer. This review provides an overview of the key targets currently undergoing clinical evaluation, as well as how drug development has evolved over the past 20 years and what the new few years may hold.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available