4.5 Article

Neighborhood-Level Redlining and Lending Bias Are Associated with Breast Cancer Mortality in a Large and Diverse Metropolitan Area

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 53-60

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention and Control Research program
  2. Winship Research Informatics shared resources
  3. Komen Foundation [CCR19608510]
  4. US NCI [F31CA239566]
  5. NCI [R01CA214805, HHSN261201800003I, HHSN26100001]
  6. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5NU58DP003875-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that living in redlined areas significantly increases breast cancer mortality, while residing in areas with pronounced lending bias decreases breast cancer mortality. Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White women experience different levels of mortality under these influences, highlighting the need for further research.
Background: Structural inequities have important implications for the health of marginalized groups. Neighborhood-level redlining and lending bias represent state-sponsored systems of segregation, potential drivers of adverse health outcomes. We sought to estimate the effect of redlining and lending bias on breast cancer mortality and explore differences by race. Methods: Using Georgia Cancer Registry data, we included 4,943 non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 3,580 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women with a first primary invasive breast cancer diagnosis in metro-Atlanta (2010-2014). Redlining and lending bias were derived for census tracts using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of redlining, lending bias on breast cancer mortality and estimated race-stratified associations. Results: Overall, 20% of NHW and 80% of NHB women lived in redlined census tracts, and 60% of NHW and 26% of NHB women lived in census tracts with pronounced lending bias. Living in redlined census tracts was associated with a nearly 1.60-fold increase in breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.82) while residing in areas with substantial lending bias reduced the hazard of breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99). Among NHB women living in redlined census tracts, we observed a slight increase in breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio - 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.42); among NHW women the association was more pronounced (hazard ratio- 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78). Conclusions: These findings underscore the role of ecologic measures of structural racism on cancer outcomes. Impact: Place-based measures are important contributors to health outcomes, an important unexplored area that offers potential interventions to address disparities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available