4.4 Article

A heat-transfer model for tube fouling in the radiant section of once-through steam generators

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 789-802

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23880

Keywords

heat transfer; oil sands; OTSG; steam generation; tube fouling

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that fouling in OTSGs introduces significant thermal resistance, reducing heat transfer rate and increasing tube-wall temperature, potentially exceeding safe operating limits.
Once-through steam generators (OTSGs) produce steam by recycling produced water in the steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) process for extracting Alberta's oil sands via in situ recovery of bitumen. The industry's specifications for water quality, steam quality, and water recycle ratio, as well as high temperature and pressure operations, lead to the fouling of OTSG tubes, which has important economic, safety, and environmental consequences. The roles and mechanisms of inorganic and organic impurities on tube fouling also complicate the study of heat transfer in OTSGs. Heat transfer in OTSGs involves radiation, convection, conduction, forced convection, and boiling. In this investigation on OTSG fouling, a steady-state mathematical model was built in Microsoft Excel, incorporating industry design data, to demonstrate the impact of tube fouling on heat transfer and tube-wall temperature. The model predictions indicate that tube fouling introduces a significant thermal resistance that not only decreases the rate of heat transfer but also causes an increase in the tube-wall temperature such that it could exceed the safe operating limits of the tube material, leading to potential tube failures.Predictions are provided for the average tube-wall temperature exceeding the recommended operating limit of 700 K over a range of foulant thermal conductivity (ie, 0.05-2 W m(-1)K(-1)) and foulant thickness (ie, 0.4-11 mm corresponding to 0.1%-30% of the tube radius).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available