4.3 Review

The effect of cricoid pressure on tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01830-1

Keywords

cricoid pressure; Sellick maneuver; intubation; rapid sequence intubation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this meta-analysis, the application of cricoid pressure did not significantly affect the successful first-attempt intubation rate or laryngoscopic view, but it may slightly prolong intubation time and increase the risk of postoperative hoarseness.
Purpose This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of cricoid pressure (CP) application on intubation outcomes. Source Electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane review) were searched from inception to 2 June 2020 for randomized-controlled trials that assessed the intubation outcomes in adult patients using laryngoscopic approaches with and without the application of CP (i.e., CPvsnon-CP group). The primary outcome was the successful first-attempt intubation rate (SFAIR), and the secondary outcomes were intubation time, incidences of poor laryngoscopic views (i.e., Cormack and Lehane grade 3-4), airway complications, and pulmonary aspiration. Principal findings A total of five trials (published from 2005 to 2018) were included, and all tracheal intubations were performed by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists with a video (n= 3) or Macintosh laryngoscope (n= 2) in the operating room. We found no significant difference in SFAIR (risk ratio [RR], 0.98;P= 0.37), incidence of poor laryngoscopic views (RR, 1.49;P= 0.21), and risk of sore throat (RR, 1.17;P= 0.73) between the two groups. Nevertheless, the intubation time on the first successful attempt was slightly longer (weighted mean difference = 4.40 sec,P= 0.002) and risk of hoarseness was higher (RR, 1.70;P= 0.03) in the CP group compared with in the non-CP group. The secondary outcome pulmonary aspiration was not analyzed because only one trial was available. Conclusion The application of CP did not have a negative impact on the SFAIR or laryngoscopic view. Nevertheless, this maneuver may slightly prolong intubation time and increase the risk of postoperative hoarseness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available