4.5 Article

Critical evaluation and thermodynamic modeling of the Fe-P and Fe-C-P system

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101795

Keywords

Fe-P; Fe-P-C; CALPHAD; Modified quasichemical model (MQM); Short-range ordering (SRO); Thermodynamic database

Funding

  1. COMET program within the K2 Center Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE) [859480]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK)
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorus is known to be a strongly segregating element in steel; even small amounts influence the solidification phenomena and product quality during casting processes. In order to provide an accurate prediction tool for process control in steelmaking, a CALPHAD-type thermodynamic optimization of the Fe-C-P system was performed including modeling of the binary Fe-P subsystem. The liquid phase was modeled using the Modified Quasichemical Model (MQM) in the pair approximation, which generally yields better results for strong shortrange ordering (SRO) tendency in the solution. The solid bcc and fcc solutions were described using the Compound Energy Formalism (CEF). In addition, ab-initio calculations were performed to estimate the enthalpies of formation of the corresponding end-member for fcc and bcc, respectively. The phosphides Fe3P, Fe2P and FeP were treated as stoichiometric compounds. Higher order phosphides were not considered, since there is no reliable experimental information available in literature. The present model successfully reproduces most of the literature data within the experimental uncertainty in the Fe-C-P system without introducing a ternary parameter for the liquid phase. Compared with previous thermodynamic assessments, the agreement with recently published thermal analysis measurements of Fe-P and Fe-C-P alloys is significantly improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available