4.4 Review

On farm interventions to minimise Campylobacter spp. contamination in chicken

Journal

BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 53-67

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2020.1813253

Keywords

Campylobacter; contamination; on farm; interventions; chicken

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review explores current and proposed on-farm interventions for controlling Campylobacter spp., with findings suggesting that water acidification and dietary supplements may have positive impacts on pathogen control. However, limitations exist in poultry vaccination. Additionally, synergistic effects may be achieved by combining dietary approaches with improved biosecurity measures.
1. This review explores current and proposed on-farm interventions and assess the potential of these interventions againstCampylobacterspp. 2. Interventions such as vaccination, feed/water-additives and, most importantly, consistent biosecurity, exhibit potential for the effective control of this pathogen and its dissemination within the food chain. 3. Due to the extensive diversity in theCampylobacterspp. genome and surface-expressed proteins, vaccination of poultry is not yet regarded as a completely effective strategy. 4. The acidification of drinking water through the addition of organic acids has been reported to decrease the risk ofCampylobacterspp. colonisation in broiler flocks. Whilst this treatment alone will not completely protect birds, use of water acidification in combination with in-feed measures to further reduce the level ofCampylobacterspp. colonisation in poultry may be an option meriting further exploration. 5. The use of varied types of feed supplements to reduce the intestinal population and shedding rate ofCampylobacterspp. in poultry is an area of growing interest in the poultry industry. Such supplements include pro - and pre-biotics, organic acids, bacteriocins and bacteriophage, which may be added to feed and water. 6. From the literature, it is clear that a distinct, albeit not unexpected, difference between the performance of in-feed interventions exists when examinedinvitrocompared to those determined ininvivostudies. It is much more likely that pooling some of the discussed approaches in the in-feed tool kit will provide an answer. 7. Whilst on-farm biosecurity is essential to maintain a healthy flock and reduce disease transmission, even the most stringent biosecurity measures may not have sufficient, consistent and predictable effects in controllingCampylobacterspp. Furthermore, the combination of varied dietary approaches and improved biosecurity measures may synergistically improve control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available