4.6 Article

Tennis-specific extension of the International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 9-13

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102360

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. International Tennis Federation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The IOC has proposed standard methods for recording injury and illness data in sports, and this statement is a tennis-specific extension of the partner IOC statement. The International Tennis Federation, in collaboration with external experts, reached a consensus on athlete health monitoring issues specific to tennis.
The IOC has proposed standard methods for recording and reporting of data for injury and illness in sport. The IOC consensus statement authors anticipated that sport-specific statements would provide further recommendations. This statement is the tennis-specific extension of the partner IOC statement. The International Tennis Federation Sport Science and Medicine Committee, in collaboration with selected external experts, met in June 2019 to consider athlete health monitoring issues specific to tennis. Once the IOC consensus statement was finalised, the tennis-specific consensus was drafted and agreed on by the members over three iterations. Compared with the IOC consensus statement, the tennis consensus contains tennis-specific information on injury mechanism, mode of onset, injury classification, injury duration, capturing and reporting exposure, reporting risk and study population. Our recommendations apply to able-bodied as well as wheelchair tennis players. Where applicable, specific recommendations are made for wheelchair tennis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available