4.5 Article

Perceptron ensemble of graph-based positive-unlabeled learning for disease gene identification

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 263-270

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.07.004

Keywords

Disease gene identification; Biological networks; Positive-unlabeled learning; Ensemble of classifiers; Perceptron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of disease genes, using computational methods, is an important issue in biomedical and bioinformatics research. According to observations that diseases with the same or similar phenotype have the same biological characteristics, researchers have tried to identify genes by using machine learning tools. In recent attempts, some semi-supervised learning methods, called positive-unlabeled learning, is used for disease gene identification. In this paper, we present a Perceptron ensemble of graph-based positive-unlabeled learning (PEGPUL) on three types of biological attributes: gene ontologies, protein domains and protein-protein interaction networks. In our method, a reliable set of positive and negative genes are extracted using co-training schema. Then, the similarity graph of genes is built using metric learning by concentrating on multi-rank-walk method to perform inference from labeled genes. At last, a Perceptron ensemble is learned from three weighted classifiers: multilevel support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor and decision tree. The main contributions of this paper are: (i) incorporating the statistical properties of gene data through choosing proper metrics, (ii) statistical evaluation of biological features, and (iii) noise robustness characteristic of PEGPUL via using multilevel schema. In order to assess PEGPUL, we have applied it on 12950 disease genes with 949 positive genes from six class of diseases and 12001 unlabeled genes. Compared with some popular disease gene identification methods, the experimental results show that PEGPUL has reasonable performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available