Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 218, Issue 3, Pages 125-127Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.164
Keywords
Anti-anxiety drugs; anxiety disorders; comorbidity; drug interactions and side-effects; drugs of dependence
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The current discussions on benzodiazepines in psychiatric literature have shown a negative bias and deviated from the scientific evidence base. It is recommended to return to the evidence and adhere to clear definitions and conceptual rigor when discussing benzodiazepines.
We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available