Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 1608-1615Publisher
SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01056-4
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Nordic Cancer Union
- Icelandic Cancer Society
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background The natural history of breast cancer amongBRCA2carriers has not been clearly established. In a previous study from Iceland, positive ER status was a negative prognostic factor. We sought to identify factors that predicted survival after invasive breast cancer in an expanded cohort ofBRCA2carriers. Methods We studied 608 women with invasive breast cancer and a pathogenicBRCA2mutation (variant) from four Nordic countries. Information on prognostic factors and treatment was retrieved from health records and by analysis of archived tissue specimens. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for breast cancer-specific survival using Cox regression. Results About 77% of cancers were ER-positive, with the highest proportion (83%) in patients under 40 years. ER-positive breast cancers were more likely to be node-positive (59%) than ER-negative cancers (34%) (P < 0.001). The survival analysis included 584 patients. Positive ER status was protective in the first 5 years from diagnosis (multivariate HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.93,P = 0.03); thereafter, the effect was adverse (HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.07-3.39,P = 0.03). The adverse effect of positive ER status was limited to women who did not undergo endocrine treatment (HR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.26-4.44,P = 0.01) and patients with intact ovaries (HR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.11-3.59,P = 0.02). Conclusions The adverse effect of a positive ER status inBRCA2carriers with breast cancer may be contingent on exposure to ovarian hormones.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available