4.7 Review

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on survival in patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 1705-1712

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01060-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Edinburgh CRUK Cancer Research Centre
  2. CRUK programme [C348/A18927]
  3. NES SCREDS clinical lectureship
  4. ECAT-linked CRUK ECRC Clinical training award [C157/A23218]
  5. CRUK Career Development Fellowship [C31250/A22804]
  6. CSO Senior Clinical Fellowship
  7. MRC Human Genetics Unit Centre Grant [U127527202, U127527198]
  8. MRC [MR/M004007/1, MC_PC_U127527198, MR/K018647/1, MC_UU_00007/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Low circulating vitamin D levels are associated with poor colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. We assess whether vitamin D supplementation improves CRC survival outcomes. Methods PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Randomised controlled trial (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation reporting CRC mortality were included. RCTs with high risk of bias were excluded from analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis models calculated estimates of survival benefit with supplementation. The review is registered on PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020173397. Results Seven RCTs (n = 957 CRC cases) were identified: three trials included patients with CRC at outset, and four population trials reported survival in incident cases. Two RCTs were excluded from meta-analysis (high risk of bias; no hazard ratio (HR)). While trials varied in inclusion criteria, intervention dose and outcomes, meta-analysis found a 30% reduction in adverse CRC outcomes with supplementation (n = 815, HR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.93). A beneficial effect was seen in trials of CRC patients (progression-free survival, HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.36-0.94), with suggestive effect in incident CRC cases from population trials (CRC-specific survival, HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.39-1.13). No heterogeneity or publication bias was noted. Conclusions Meta-analysis demonstrates a clinically meaningful benefit of vitamin D supplementation on CRC survival outcomes. Further well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are needed to fully evaluate benefit of supplementation in augmenting 'real-life' follow-up and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, as well as determining optimal dosing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available