4.5 Article

iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis after mesenchymal stem cell line transplantation for ischemic stroke

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1742, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146900

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells; Quantitative proteomic analysis; Ischemic stroke; Glutamate excitotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Brain plasticity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transplantation with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been reported to promote functional recovery in animal models of ischemic stroke. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of MSC transplantation have been only partially elucidated. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively identify changes in brain proteins in rats treated with MSCs for ischemic stroke, and to explore the multi-target mechanisms of MSCs using a proteomics-based strategy. Twenty-eight proteins were found to be differentially expressed following B10 MSC transplantation in adult male Wistar rats, as assessed using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute protein quantification (iTRAQ). Subsequent bioinformatic analysis revealed that these proteins were mainly associated with energy metabolism, glutamate excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and brain structural and functional plasticity. Immunohistochemical staining revealed decreased expression of EAAT1 in the phosphate-buffered saline group as opposed to normal levels in the B10 transplantation group. Furthermore, ATP levels were also significantly higher in the B10 transplantation group, thus supporting the iTRAQ results. Our results suggest that the therapeutic effects of B10 transplantation might arise from the modulation of the acute ischemic cascade via multiple molecular pathways. Thus, our findings provide valuable clues to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of MSC transplantation in ischemic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available