4.5 Article

Pediatric neurodevelopment by prenatal Zika virus exposure: a cross-sectional study of the Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group Cohort

Journal

BMC PEDIATRICS
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02331-2

Keywords

Child behavior; Child development; Congenital Zika syndrome; Microcephaly

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [734584]
  2. Wellcome Trust [201870/Z/16/Z, 205377/Z/16/Z, MC_PC_15088]
  3. UK Department for International Development [201870/Z/16/Z, 205377/Z/16/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust - Research Enrichment in Epidemic Situations [107779/Z/15/Z, ER1505, ER1601]
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia de PE FACEPE [APQ-0192-4.01/17, APQ-0172-4.01/16]
  7. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  8. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [309722/2017-9, 306708/2014-0, 308175/2017-4]
  9. Secretaria de Vigilancia em Saude/Ministerio da Saude de Brasil Resposta a Emergencia em Saude Publica - Zika virus e Microcefalia [837058/2016]
  10. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  11. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  12. Departamento de Ciencia e Tecnologia [440839/2016-5]
  13. MRC [MC_PC_15088] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The implications of congenital Zika Virus (ZIKV) infections for pediatric neurodevelopment and behavior remain inadequately studied. The aim of this study is to investigate patterns of neurodevelopment and behavior in groups of children with differening severities of ZIKV-related microcephaly and children with prenatal ZIKV exposure in the absence of microcephaly. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study, nested in a cohort, of 274 children (aged 10-45 months) who were born during the peak and decline of the microcephaly epidemic in Northeast Brazil. Participants were evaluated between February 2017 and August 2019 at two tertiary care hospitals in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. We analyzed the children in four groups assigned based on clinical and laboratory criteria: Group 1 had severe microcephaly; Group 2 had moderate microcephaly; Group 3 had prenatal ZIKVexposure confirmed by maternal RT-PCR testing but no microcephaly; and Group 4 was a neurotypical control group. Groups were evaluated clinically for neurological abnormalities and compared using the Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC), a neurodevelopment and behavior screening instrument validated for use in Brazil. Children with severe delays underwent further evaluation with an adapted version of the SWYC. Results: Based on the SWYC screening, we observed differences between the groups for developmental milestones but not behavior. Among the 114 children with severe microcephaly of whom 98.2% presented with neurological abnormalities, 99.1% were 'at risk of development delay' according to the SWYC instrument. Among the 20 children with moderate microcephaly of whom 60% presented with neurological abnormalities, 65% were 'at risk of development delay'. For children without microcephaly, the percentages found to be 'at risk of developmental delay' were markedly lower and did not differ by prenatal ZIKV exposure status: Group 3 (N=94), 13.8%; Group 4 (N=46), 21.7%. Conclusions: Among children with prenatal ZIKV exposure, we found a gradient of risk of development delay according to head circumference. Children with severe microcephaly were at highest risk for delays, while normocephalic ZIKV-exposed children had similar risks to unexposed control children. We propose that ZIKV-exposed children should undergo first-line screening for neurodevelopment and behavior using the SWYC instrument. Early assessment and follow-up will enable at-risk children to be referred to a more comprehensive developmental evaluation and to multidisciplinary care management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available