Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals
D. O. Croitoru et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY (2020)
Data extraction methods: an analysis of internal reporting discrepancies in single manuscripts and practical advice
Livia Puljak et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Overall bias methods and their use in sensitivity analysis of Cochrane reviews were not consistent
Andrija Babic et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Do randomised controlled trials relevant to pharmacy meet best practice standards for quality conduct and reporting? A systematic review
Alison Ritchie et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE (2020)
Mapping the nomenclature, methodology, and reporting of studies that review methods: a pilot methodological review
Daeria O. Lawson et al.
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES (2020)
Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
Katarina Maticic et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
Tanja Rombey et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan et al.
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES (2019)
Awareness of and potential for dependent error in the observational epidemiologic literature: A review
Lynsie R. Ranker et al.
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
A systematic methodological review of non-randomised interventional studies of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and a standardised minimum dataset are needed
S. G. Parker et al.
HERNIA (2019)
Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
Marina Krnic Martinic et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
Miney Paquette et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2019)
Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations
Monika Mueller et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
Agreement in reporting between trial publications and current clinical trial registry in high impact journals: A methodological review
Sarah Daisy Kosa et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2018)
Adherence to CONSORT Items in Randomized Controlled Trials of Integrative Medicine for Colorectal Cancer Published in Chinese Journals
Menghua Chen et al.
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE (2018)
Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey
Lara A. Kahale et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
A Review of Industry Funding in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Neurosurgical Literature-The Elephant in the Room
Nickalus R. Khan et al.
NEUROSURGERY (2018)
A cross-sectional study of the reporting quality of pilot or feasibility trials in high-impact anesthesia journals
Harsha Shanthanna et al.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE (2018)
Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
Blair Wilson et al.
EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL (2018)
A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews
Iosief Abraha et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Systematic survey of randomized trials evaluating the impact of alternative diagnostic strategies on patient-important outcomes
Regina El Dib et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials
Yuqing Zhang et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Differences in Treatment Effect Size Between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Immunotherapy Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study of Trials With Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov
Aidan Tan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)
The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey
Luciana P. F. Abbade et al.
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research
Guowei Li et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
The reporting quality of abstracts of stepped wedge randomized trials is suboptimal: A systematic survey of the literature
Mei Wang et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS (2017)
Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
Tim Mathes et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain
Daniel Riado Minguez et al.
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2017)
The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review
Naomi Schalken et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
Blinding in Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials in 2015
Benjamin Speich
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2017)
PDF text classification to leverage information extraction from publication reports
Duy Duc An Bui et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS (2016)
Extractive text summarization system to aid data extraction from full text in systematic review development
Duy Duc An Bui et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS (2016)
Critical EPICOT items were absent in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews: a bibliometnc analysis
Lawrence Mbuagbaw et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format
Alonso Carrasco-Labra et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Methodology Series Module 5: Sampling Strategies
Maninder Singh Setia
INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY (2016)
Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review
Faeze Gohari et al.
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS (2016)
Use of clustering analysis in randomized controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery
Hanna Oltean et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2015)
Measurements of Gluconeogenesis and Glycogenolysis: A Methodological Review
Stephanie T. Chung et al.
DIABETES (2015)
The influence of industry sponsorship on the reporting of subgroup analyses within phase III randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal oncology
Sarah Barton et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2015)
Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review
Lawrence Mbuagbaw et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2014)
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
An-Wen Chan et al.
LANCET (2014)
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
LANCET (2014)
Why Publish Study Protocols?
Patricia J. Ohtake et al.
PHYSICAL THERAPY (2014)
Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
Padhraig S. Fleming et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis
Malgorzata M. Bala et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in trauma surgery with the CONSORT statement
Seon-Young Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY (2013)
Compliance to the CONSORT statement of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation: a 3-year overview
Liang Q. Liu et al.
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Is funding source related to study reporting quality in obesity or nutrition randomized control trials in top-tier medical journals?
K. A. Kaiser et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY (2012)
Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension
Petra Schiller et al.
TRIALS (2012)
The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement
Victoria Borg Debono et al.
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY (2012)
Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
Sally Hopewell et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)
P-values in baseline tables of randomised controlled trials are inappropriate but still common in high impact journals
M. J. Knol et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY (2012)
Can the predictive studies be trusted?
Helene Vaillant-Roussel et al.
EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE (2012)
Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review
Walter Bouwmeester et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2012)
Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery A review
Erin N. Kiehna et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2011)
Quality of reporting of two-group parallel randomized controlled clinical trials of multi-herb formulae: A survey of reports indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded
Yunqing Zhong et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE (2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials
Tjalling W. de Vries et al.
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD (2010)
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
M. Areia et al.
ENDOSCOPY (2010)
Analysis of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Governed by the CONSORT Statement
Dimitrios C. Ziogas et al.
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals
F. Alvarez et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY (2009)
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study
Andrea C. Tricco et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Iain Chalmers et al.
LANCET (2009)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Industry funding and the reporting quality of large long-term weight loss trials
O. Thomas et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY (2008)
Confounding: What it is and how to deal with it
K. J. Jager et al.
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL (2008)
What is the quality of reporting in weight loss intervention studies? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
L. Thabane et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY (2007)
Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery - Can we do better?
Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2006)
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
Nina Buscemi et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials:: Are most of them misleading?
AV Hernández et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2006)
Methodological issues in trials assessing primary prophylaxis of venous thrombo-embolism
G Thabut et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2006)
From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals
ES Rosmarakis et al.
FASEB JOURNAL (2005)
Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research
JAC Sterne et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Bias and causal associations in observational research
DA Grimes et al.
LANCET (2002)
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
D Moher et al.
LANCET (2001)
Share Paper
