4.4 Article

Rapid establishment of a COVID-19 perinatal biorepository: early lessons from the first 100 women enrolled

Journal

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01102-y

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Pandemic; Biobank; Repository; Pregnancy; Newborn; Vertical transmission; Immune; Obstetrics; Neonatology

Funding

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [1R01HD100022-01, K23 HD097300-01]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [5P30DK040561-23]
  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [K08HL143183]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U01AI106701]
  5. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [YONKER18Q0]
  6. Mark and Lisa Schwartz
  7. Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research through the Center for Diversity and Inclusion
  8. Claflin Distinguished Award from Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Collection of biospecimens is a critical first step to understanding the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women and newborns - vulnerable populations that are challenging to enroll and at risk of exclusion from research. We describe the establishment of a COVID-19 perinatal biorepository, the unique challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and strategies used to overcome them. Methods A transdisciplinary approach was developed to maximize the enrollment of pregnant women and their newborns into a COVID-19 prospective cohort and tissue biorepository, established on March 19, 2020 at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). The first SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant woman was enrolled on April 2, and enrollment was expanded to SARS-CoV-2 negative controls on April 20. A unified enrollment strategy with a single consent process for pregnant women and newborns was implemented on May 4. SARS-CoV-2 status was determined by viral detection on RT-PCR of a nasopharyngeal swab. Wide-ranging and pregnancy-specific samples were collected from maternal participants during pregnancy and postpartum. Newborn samples were collected during the initial hospitalization. Results Between April 2 and June 9, 100 women and 78 newborns were enrolled in the MGH COVID-19 biorepository. The rate of dyad enrollment and number of samples collected per woman significantly increased after changes to enrollment strategy (from 5 to over 8 dyads/week,P < 0.0001, and from 7 to 9 samples,P < 0.01). The number of samples collected per woman was higher in SARS-CoV-2 negative than positive women (9 vs 7 samples,P = 0.0007). The highest sample yield was for placenta (96%), umbilical cord blood (93%), urine (99%), and maternal blood (91%). The lowest-yield sample types were maternal stool (30%) and breastmilk (22%). Of the 61 delivered women who also enrolled their newborns, fewer women agreed to neonatal blood compared to cord blood (39 vs 58,P < 0.0001). Conclusions Establishing a COVID-19 perinatal biorepository required patient advocacy, transdisciplinary collaboration and creative solutions to unique challenges. This biorepository is unique in its comprehensive sample collection and the inclusion of a control population. It serves as an important resource for research into the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women and newborns and provides lessons for future biorepository efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available