4.1 Article

A versatile lab-on-chip test platform to characterize elementary deformation mechanisms and electromechanical couplings in nanoscopic objects

Journal

COMPTES RENDUS PHYSIQUE
Volume 17, Issue 3-4, Pages 485-495

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.11.005

Keywords

Nanomechanical testing; Thin films; Size-effects; Fracture; In situ TEM; Piezoresistance

Funding

  1. Politique scientifique federale under interuniversity attraction poles program [IAP7/21]
  2. Communaute francaise de Belgique under the program Actions de recherche concertees [ARC 05/10-330]
  3. ARC [11/16-037]
  4. Fonds beige pour la recherche dans l'industrie et l'agriculture (FRIA)
  5. FWO [G012012N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nanomechanical on-chip test platform has recently been developed to deform under a variety of loading conditions freestanding thin films, ribbons and nanowires involving submicron dimensions. The lab-on-chip involves thousands of elementary test structures from which the elastic modulus, strength, strain hardening, fracture, creep properties can be extracted. The technique is amenable to in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations to unravel the fundamental underlying deformation and fracture mechanisms that often lead to size-dependent effects in small-scale samples. The method allows addressing electrical and magnetic couplings as well in order to evaluate the impact of large mechanical stress levels on different solid-state physics phenomena. We had the chance to present this technique in details to Jacques Friedel in 2012 who, unsurprisingly, made a series of critical and very relevant suggestions. In the spirit of his legacy, the paper will address both mechanics of materials related phenomena and couplings with solids state physics issues. (C) 2015 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available