4.5 Review

The clinical implications of clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Journal

BLOOD REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100744

Keywords

Clonal hematopoiesis; Hematopoietic stem cell; Age-related clonal hematopoiesis; Allogeneic transplantation; Autologous transplantation; Donor-derived

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clonal hematopoiesis refers to somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells leading to clonal expansion, which increases with age; its role in hematopoietic cell transplantation is becoming increasingly important; post-transplant hematopoiesis is influenced by various factors, requiring more large-scale studies to establish a management approach for CH.
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) describes somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells resulting in clonal expansion in individuals with no overt hematologic disease. Since CH increases in an age-related manner, understanding its role in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has become increasingly relevant to an aging transplant population. Multiple factors distinguish post-transplant hematopoiesis from unperturbed, steady-state hematopoiesis, including the influence of immunosuppressants, cytotoxic reagents, and marked proliferative stress, all of which may enhance or diminish the opportunity for clonal expansion. We reviewed the available clinical evidence on the consequences of CH at time of transplant in patients undergoing autologous HCT, and the impact of donor and recipient CH on allogeneic HCT outcomes. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines, we share our suggestions for managing donors and recipients found to have CH. Large-scale studies are needed to guide an evidence-based, uniform approach for the management of CH in the setting of HCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available