4.7 Article

Effects of biofilm transfer and electron mediators transfer onKlebsiella quasipneumoniaesp. 203 electricity generation performance in MFCs

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01800-1

Keywords

Microbial fuel cells; Electricity generation performance; Extracellular electron transfer; Biofilm; Electron mediators

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. Xuzhou Science and Technology Innovation Project [KC17082]
  3. Graduate Student Research and Innovation Project of Jiangsu Normal University [2019XKT405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Extracellular electron transfer (EET) is essential in improving the power generation performance of electrochemically active bacteria (EAB) in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Currently, the EET mechanisms of dissimilatory metal-reducing (DMR) model bacteriaShewanella oneidensisandGeobacter sulfurreducenshave been thoroughly studied.Klebsiellahas also been proved to be an EAB capable of EET, but the EET mechanism has not been perfected. This study investigated the effects of biofilm transfer and electron mediators transfer onKlebsiella quasipneumoniaesp. 203 electricity generation performance in MFCs. Results Herein, we covered the anode of MFC with a layer of microfiltration membrane to block the effect of the biofilm mechanism, and then explore the EET of the electron mediator mechanism ofK. quasipneumoniaesp. 203 and electricity generation performance. In the absence of short-range electron transfer, we found thatK. quasipneumoniaesp. 203 can still produce a certain power generation performance, and coated-MFC reached 40.26 mW/m(2)at a current density of 770.9 mA/m(2,)whereas the uncoated-MFC reached 90.69 mW/m(2)at a current density of 1224.49 mA/m(2). The difference in the electricity generation performance between coated-MFC and uncoated-MFC was probably due to the microfiltration membrane covered in anode, which inhibited the growth of EAB on the anode. Therefore, we speculated thatK. quasipneumoniaesp. 203 can also perform EET through the biofilm mechanism. The protein content, the integrity of biofilm and the biofilm activity all proved that the difference in the electricity generation performance between coated-MFC and uncoated-MFC was due to the extremely little biomass of the anode biofilm. To further verify the effect of electron mediators on electricity generation performance of MFCs, 10 mu M 2,6-DTBBQ, 2,6-DTBHQ and DHNA were added to coated-MFC and uncoated-MFC. Combining the time-voltage curve and CV curve, we found that 2,6-DTBBQ and 2,6-DTBHQ had high electrocatalytic activity toward the redox reaction ofK. quasipneumoniaesp. 203-inoculated MFCs. It was also speculated thatK. quasipneumoniaesp. 203 produced 2,6-DTBHQ and 2,6-DTBBQ. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, the three modes of EET did not exist separately.K. quasipneumoniaesp.203 will adopt the corresponding electron transfer mode or multiple ways to realize EET according to the living environment to improve electricity generation performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available