4.3 Article

Approximate maximum likelihood estimation for logistic regression with covariate measurement error

Journal

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 27-45

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202000024

Keywords

approximate maximum likelihood; logistic regression; measurement error; nutritional epidemiology

Funding

  1. European Union (European Community) [LSHM-CT-2006-037197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces an approximate maximum likelihood estimation (AMLE) method for covariates with measurement error under logistic regression, which is applied to address measurement errors in interested nutrients of the EPIC-InterAct Study using sensitivity analysis framework. Simulation studies are conducted to examine the performance of the proposed method in finite samples.
In nutritional epidemiology, dietary intake assessed with a food frequency questionnaire is prone to measurement error. Ignoring the measurement error in covariates causes estimates to be biased and leads to a loss of power. In this paper, we consider an additive error model according to the characteristics of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-InterAct Study data, and derive an approximate maximum likelihood estimation (AMLE) for covariates with measurement error under logistic regression. This method can be regarded as an adjusted version of regression calibration and can provide an approximate consistent estimator. Asymptotic normality of this estimator is established under regularity conditions, and simulation studies are conducted to empirically examine the finite sample performance of the proposed method. We apply AMLE to deal with measurement errors in some interested nutrients of the EPIC-InterAct Study under a sensitivity analysis framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available