4.8 Article

Renal clearable Hafnium-doped carbon dots for CT/Fluorescence imaging of orthotopic liver cancer

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120110

Keywords

Hafnium-doped; Carbon dots; X-ray computed tomography (CT); Fluorescence imaging; Orthotopic liver cancer; Renal clearance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873023, 51973214]
  2. Talent Development Fund of Jilin Province
  3. Research Project of Science and Technology of the Education Department of Jilin Province [JJKH20200648KJ]
  4. Jilin Province Science and Technology Research Project [20200201088JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots (CDs) are emerging as powerful nanoprobes for multiple-model bioimaging. Nowadays, orthotopic xenograft models attract increasing attention because of their superiorities of duplicating the tumor microenvironment. However, compared with the extensive study of subcutaneous xenograft tumors, less attention has been paid to CDs for in vivo orthotopic tumor imaging. Furthermore, it is very desirable for a nanoprobe to achieve preferential accumulation at the tumor site and efficient renal clearance. In this work, a novel kind of Hafnium-doped CDs (HfCDs) were successfully prepared via a simple one-pot pyrolysis method. The significant advantages including robust stability, good biocompatibility, excellent water solubility, remarkable computed tomography (CT) contrast performance and preferential tumor accumulation capability endow HfCDs with particular functions of CT/fluorescence imaging of orthotopic liver cancer initially. More importantly, HfCDs could locate at the tumor site and achieve the rapid imaging within 1 min. The findings of the current study represent a facile and universal approach to fabricate outstanding renal clearable multimodal imaging nanoprobes with great potential for clinical diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available