4.7 Article

Rapid Synthesis of Silk-Like Polymers Facilitated by Microwave Irradiation and Click Chemistry

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 95-105

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00563

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  2. Undergraduate Research Fund at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a two-stage approach for rapid synthesis of silk-like polymers by utilizing solid-phase peptide synthesis and microwave-assisted step-growth polymerization. By exploring multiple coupling chemistries and reaction conditions, polymers with properties similar to natural silk fibroin were successfully synthesized in a short period of time.
Silk is a natural fiber that surpasses most man-made polymers in its combination of strength and toughness. Silk fibroin, the primary protein component of silk, can be synthetically mimicked by a linear copolymer with alternating rigid and soft segments. Strategies for chemical synthesis of such silk-like polymers have persistently resulted in poor sequence control, long reaction times, and low molecular weights. Here, we present a two-stage approach for rapidly synthesizing silk-like polymers with precisely defined rigid blocks. This approach utilizes solid-phase peptide synthesis to create uniform oligoalanine prepolymers, followed by microwave-assisted step-growth polymerization with bifunctional poly(ethylene glycol). Multiple coupling chemistries and reaction conditions were explored, with microwave-assisted click chemistry yielding polymers with M-w similar to 14 kg/mol in less than 20 min. These polymers formed antiparallel beta-sheets and nanofibers, which is consistent with the structure of natural silk fibroin. Thus, our strategy demonstrates a promising modular approach for synthesizing silk-like polymers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available