4.6 Article

How siderophore production can influence the biocontrol activity of Aureobasidium pullulans against Monilinia laxa on peaches

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104456

Keywords

Yeast; Iron; Stone fruit; Monilinia laxa; Siderophore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Aureobasidium pullulans strains L1 and L8 were shown to compete with Monilinia laxa for iron through the secretion of siderophores, preventing postharvest fruit decay of peaches. These strains demonstrated better efficacy in reducing M. laxa's growth and germination at lower iron concentrations, indicating a potential biocontrol solution for agricultural use.
In the present study Aureobasidium pullulans strains L1 and L8 were shown both in vitro and in vivo to compete for iron with Monilinia laxa through the secretion of siderophores (1.2 and 1.4 mg ml-1, respectively) and to prevent postharvest fruit decay of peaches. The two strains reduced mycelial growth and conidial germination of M. laxa specially in presence of lower iron concentrations (5 and 10 mu g l(-1) FeCl3), confirming a better efficacy when nutrients are scarce. In in vivo assay, A. pullulans L1 and L8 strains inhibited pathogen virulence, reducing by 83.5% and 84.4% on average respectively the peach lesion diameter for each tested iron solutions (5, 10, 20 mu g l(-1) FeCl3,). The highest iron solution slowed down the antagonists' action and conversely increase the pathogen aggressiveness. Results shows that A. pullulans L1 and L8 strains compete with M. laxa for iron, so revealing new biocontrol aspects. Both strains showed the capability to decrease the accumulation of iron competing with some fungal pathogens and reducing their virulence. These results provide new perspectives for the use of biocontrol agents in agriculture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available