4.6 Article

Recognition of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain by neutralizing antibodies

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.012

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CoV; Neutralizing antibodies; Receptor binding domain (RBD); RBD natural mutations; Epitopes; Germline-encoded motifs; Cross-neutralization; Antibody avidity

Funding

  1. NIH [R00 AI139445]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1170236]
  3. NIH CHAVD [UM1 AI44462]
  4. NIH Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Center [75N93019C00051-0-9999-1]
  5. NIH HIVRAD [P01 AI110657]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, researchers from diverse biomedical and biological disciplines have collaborated to study the novel pandemic virus SARS-CoV-2. The focus has been on the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2, crucial for vaccine and therapeutic development. Most of the neutralizing antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 target the spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD).
Immediately from the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers from diverse biomedical and biological disciplines have united to study the novel pandemic virus, SARS-CoV-2. The antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 has been a major focus of COVID-19 research due to its clinical relevance and importance in vaccine and therapeutic development. Isolation and characterization of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 have been accumulating at an unprecedented pace. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies to date target the spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD), which engages the host receptor ACE2 for viral entry. Here we review the binding sites and molecular features of monoclonal antibodies that target the SARS-CoV-2 RBD, including a few that also cross-neutralize SARS-CoV. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available