High Frequency and Intensity Rehabilitation in 641 Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Objectives: To determine the effects of exergaming on quality of life (QoL), motor, and clinical symptoms in subacute stroke patients. Design: A pseudorandomized controlled trial, using a before-after test design. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Subacute, ischemic stroke outpatients (N=3857), 680 of whom were randomized and 641 completed the study. Interventions: We determined the effects of 5 times a week twice daily (EX2; 50 sessions; n=286) and once daily (EX1; 25 sessions; n=272) exergaming and low-intensity standard care (control [CON]; 25 sessions; n=83) on clinical, mobility, blood pressure (BP), and QoL outcomes. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was Modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes were activities of daily living, 5 aspects of health-related QoL, Beck Depression Inventory, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and static balance (center of pressure). Results: During exercise, the peak heart rate was 134, 134, and 126 beats per minute in the EX2, EX1, and CON groups, respectively. mRS improved similarly in the EX2 (-1.8; effect size, d=-4.0) and EX1 (-1.4; d=-2.6) groups, but more than in the CON group (-0.7; d=-0.6). QoL, Barthel Index, BBS, 6MWT, and standing posturography improved more in the EX2 group and the same in the EX1 and CON groups. Systolic and diastolic resting BP decreased more in the EX2 and EX1 groups than in the CON group. The intervention effects did not differ between men (n=349) and women (n=292). Conclusions: Twice daily compared with once daily high-intensity exergaming or once daily lower intensity standard care produced superior effects on clinical and motor symptoms, BP, and QoL in male and female subacute ischemic stroke participants. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102:9-18 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Automated summary

The study indicated that twice daily high-intensity exergaming had superior effects on clinical and motor symptoms, blood pressure, and quality of life in subacute stroke patients compared to once daily high-intensity or low-intensity standard care.