4.7 Article

Highly-sensitive graphene field effect transistor biosensor using PNA and DNA probes for RNA detection

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 527, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146839

Keywords

Graphene field effect transistor; PNA probe; RNA detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11604040, 61671107]
  2. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [tsqn201812104]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019PC026]
  4. Qingchuang Science and Technology Plan of Shandong Province [2019KJJ017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA probe-based biosensors have been widely developed for detecting a range of analytes. However, the DNA probe-based sensors suffer from many problems, such as long hybridization time, background electrical noise, and relatively poor specificity. In this paper, we report the ultrasensitive detection for RNA by graphene field effect transistor (G-FET) biosensor using PNA and DNA probes. The limit of detection (LOD) of the PNA probe modified G-FET sensor is down to 0.1 aM, which is three orders of magnitude lower than that of DNA probe modified G-FET sensor. We demonstrate that both PNA and DNA probe-modified G-FET have great potential in quantitative detection of RNA. A good linear electrical response to RNA concentrations is obtained in a broad range from 0.1 aM to 1 pM for PNA probe-modified G-FET and from 100 aM to 1 pM for DNA probe-modified GFET, respectively. The PNA probe-modified G-FET sensors significantly reduce the detection time compared to DNA probe-modified G-FET sensors. Moreover, the electrical response of PNA probe-modified G-FET biosensor to non-complementary RNA is negligible, showing high specificity for RNA detection. What's more, the G-FET sensor was also used to detect RNA in human serum, making it a promising way for future detection of RNA in biomedical research and early clinical diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available