4.7 Article

Electrochemically deposited graphene oxide thin film supercapacitors: Comparing liquid and solid electrolytes

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 528, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146801

Keywords

Electrochemical deposition; Graphene oxide; Supercapacitor; PVA electrolyte

Funding

  1. project 2D NanoSmart - Stavros Niarchos Foundation, Greece
  2. project 2D EMI Shield - ESA, EU
  3. project NANOPOL project - European Union [T1EDK-02663]
  4. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, graphene oxide (GO) thin films were prepared on ITO substrates by electrochemical deposition for different voltages and deposition times and were further electrochemically reduced by cyclic voltammetry (CV). Reduced GO films (rGO) were used in the manufacturing of supercapacitors with solid-state electrolyte based on a freeze-thawed PVA-Na2SO4 hydrogel. GO and rGO films were tested using SEM, XRD, RAMAN and XPS techniques for comparative reasons. The specific capacitance of the electrodes and supercapacitors were estimated by electrochemical methods. XRD analysis revealed increase of the rGO interlayer spacing after multiple CV cycles that was assigned to incorporation of the electrolytic agents such as sodium ions of the electrolyte. Raman spectra showed that the I-D/I-G ratio associated with the graphene matrix defects remained fairly constant even after several CV cycles, meaning that no new defects were added. It was the XPS analysis that confirmed the reduction of GO to rGO as well as the presence of sodium in the rGO films. The optimum value of the electrode capacitance of the constructed model supercapacitor with thin rGO films and PVA-20%Na2SO4 electrolyte was 8.55 mF/cm(2) that approaches the electrode capacitance value of 10.67 mF/cm(2) measured with liquid Na2SO4 electrolyte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available