4.7 Article

Predicting China's energy consumption using a novel grey Riccati model

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106555

Keywords

Grey Riccati model; Energy consumption; Simulated annealing algorithm; Genetic algorithm; Optimized parameter

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71901184, 71771033, 71571157, 11601357]
  2. Humanities and Social Science Project of Ministry of Education of China [19YJCZH119]
  3. National Statistical Scientific Research Project [2018LY42]
  4. Applied Basic Research Program of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Sichuan province [2017JY0159]
  5. V.C. & V.R. Key Lab of Sichuan Province [SCVCVR2019.05VS, SCVCVR2018.08VS]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University) [PLN 201710]
  7. Research center of Sichuan County Economy Development [xy2020042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the China's oil consumption and the China's nuclear energy consumption by a grey Riccati model. The newly developed model is analysed by the trapezoidal formula of definite integrals, the theory of ordinary differential equations and the grey technique. And some special cases including the GM(1,1) model, the grey Verhulst model and the grey Bass model are all discussed. Meanwhile, the hybrid of the simulated annealing algorithm and the genetic algorithm is utilized to search optimal background values. Further, the performance of the new model is verified through some experiments. Finally, the model is applied to study China's energy consumption with original sequences from 2001 to 2018 claimed by British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy 2019, and the results show that the new model can obtain competitive results and better than other comparative models. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available