Journal
APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6038
Keywords
bimetallic catalyst; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; manganese; olefin
Categories
Funding
- Czech Ministry of Education [SOLID21CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/00007, SOLID21CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000760]
- Czech Science Foundation [18-10504S]
- Operational Programme Research
- Iranian National Science Foundation [96009657]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The preparation methods of two new catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis were studied, with the catalyst prepared via thermal decomposition showing higher activity due to its smaller particle size, better dispersion, and higher surface area. The catalyst obtained by impregnation method exhibited lower activity compared to the one prepared by thermal decomposition.
In order to increase the catalyst activity for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS), the preparation methods of two new catalysts were studied. The chemically identical bimetallic Co-Mn/Al(2)O(3)catalysts were synthesized by different synthetic methods: (a) via thermal decomposition of the complex [Co1.33Mn0.667(C7H3NO4)(2)(H2O)(5)].2H(2)O (1) and (b) by the impregnation technique. The complex was characterized by the single-crystal analysis, elemental analysis, and Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Both catalysts were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area, hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), and H-2-chemisorption. The catalysts' activity was investigated for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in a fixed bed microreactor. Higher activity was obtained for the catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition of the inorganic precursor due to its small particle size, superior dispersion, and higher surface area. The results show that the catalyst prepared thermal decomposition has 21% ethylene, 10% propylene, and 50% C(5)(+)selectivity, while methane selectivity of this catalyst is 11% at 250 degrees C. On the other hand, the catalyst obtained by the impregnation method displays 15% ethylene, 8% propylene, 29% C(5)(,)(+)and 29% methane selectivity at the same temperature.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available