4.8 Article

Propane and iso-butane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process for small-scale skid-mounted natural gas liquefaction

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 275, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115333

Keywords

Natural gas liquefaction process; Pre-cooling cycle; Mixed refrigerant; Genetic algorithm; Energy consumption

Funding

  1. Zigong Tongda Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a small skid-mounted natural gas liquefaction plant can economically, environmentallyfriendly, and efficiently collect natural gas in mountainous areas where are not easy to lay pipelines. A propane and iso-butane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process (C-3&C-4-MR) is proposed in this paper. Compared with the propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process, the improved liquefaction process can reduce system energy consumption and increase exergy efficiency greatly. Genetic algorithm is applied to optimize energy consumption of C-3&C-4-MR process. The optimized specific energy consumption S-Total is 0.301 kW.h/kg, which is 18.0% lower than the optimized C-3-MR process. And compared with the optimized R410a pre-cooled mixed refrigerant liquefaction process, S-Total of C-3&C-4-MR process is 5.64% lower than that of R410a-MR process. Besides, mixed propane and isobutane as pre-coolant is easier to obtain from the feed gas. By analyzing the temperature sensitivity of mixed refrigerant and calculating the unit compression power consumption of a single refrigerant, the guidance and recommendations for mixed refrigerant ratio are summarized. Due to the property of iso-butane, the optimal percentage of iso-butane in the pre-coolant was analyzed. In conclusion, C-3&C-4-MR process is energy-saving and advanced in terms of system operating costs to recycle scattered natural gas in remote areas. Superscript/Subscript Available

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available