Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.WEB VERSUS OTHER SURVEY MODES: AN UPDATED AND EXTENDED META-ANALYSIS COMPARING RESPONSE RATES
Jessica Daikeler et al.
JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY (2020)
Building upon foundations for evidence-based policy
Robert Hahn
SCIENCE (2019)
The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures
Morgan M. Millar et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches
Floyd J. Fowler et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2019)
Subject Pools and Deception in Agricultural and Resource Economics Experiments
Timothy N. Cason et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2019)
Financial Incentives as Signals: Experimental Evidence from the Recruitment of Village Promoters in Uganda
Erika Deserranno
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS (2019)
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates for Midwestern Farmers
Zoe E. Glas et al.
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES (2019)
ADDRESSING PARTICIPANT INATTENTION IN FEDERAL PROGRAMS: A FIELD EXPERIMENT WITH THE CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM
Steven Wallander et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2017)
The effect of email invitation elements on response rate in a web survey within an online community
Andraz Petrovcic et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples: Craigslist, Google AdWords, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk
Christopher Antoun et al.
FIELD METHODS (2016)
Comparing the Similarity of Responses Received from Studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to Studies Conducted Online and with Direct Recruitment
Christoph Bartneck et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Blind stealing: Experience and expertise in a mixed-strategy poker experiment
Matt Van Essen et al.
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR (2015)
Towards an Understanding of The Performance of Ambient Tax Mechanisms in The Field:Evidence from Upstate New York Dairy Farmers
Jordan F. Suter et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2014)
Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons?
Syster C. Maart-Noelck et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2014)
Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments-extending the reach of experimental economics
Gary Charness et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION (2013)
Digging into Background Risk: Experiments with Farmers and Students
David H. Herberich et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2012)
A comparison of small monetary incentives to convert survey non-respondents: a randomized control trial
Joan M. Griffin et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
DO SOCIAL PREFERENCES INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY? FIELD EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM FISHERMEN IN TOYAMA BAY
Jeffrey Carpenter et al.
ECONOMIC INQUIRY (2011)
WHAT HAPPENS IN THE FIELD STAYS IN THE FIELD: EXPLORING WHETHER PROFESSIONALS PLAY MINIMAX IN LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Steven D. Levitt et al.
ECONOMETRICA (2010)
Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future
Steven D. Levitt et al.
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2009)
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Yehuda Baruch et al.
HUMAN RELATIONS (2008)
Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis
MS Haigh et al.
JOURNAL OF FINANCE (2005)
Using laboratory experiments for policymaking: An example from the Georgia irrigation reduction auction
RG Cummings et al.
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT (2004)
The impact of contact type on web survey response rates
SR Porter et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2003)
Share Paper
