4.6 Review Book Chapter

Gall-Inducing Parasites: Convergent and Conserved Strategies of Plant Manipulation by Insects and Nematodes

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, VOL 58
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 1-22

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012722

Keywords

galling insects; leaf-mining insects; plant-parasitic nematodes; feeding cells; nutritive cells; effectors

Categories

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) through the Investments for the Future LABEX SIGNALIFE [ANR-11-LABX-0028-01]
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  4. Universite de Tours
  5. Region Centre-Val de Loire project INSECTEFFECT [2014-00094521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gall-inducing insects and nematodes engage in sophisticated interactions with their host plants. These parasites can induce major morphological and physiological changes in host roots, leaves, and other tissues. Sedentary endoparasitic nematodes, root-knot and cyst nematodes in particular, as well as gall-inducing and leaf-mining insects, manipulate plant development to form unique organs that provide them with food from feeding cells. Sometimes, infected tissues may undergo a developmental switch resulting in the formation of aberrant and spectacular structures (clubs or galls). We describe here the complex interactions between these plant-reprogramming sedentary endoparasites and their infected hosts, focusing on similarities between strategies of plant manipulation. We highlight progress in our understanding of the host plant response to infection and focus on the nematode and insectmolecules secreted in planta. We suggest that looking at similarities may identify convergent and conserved strategies and shed light on the promise they hold for the development of new management strategies in agriculture and forestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available