4.7 Article

Geopolymer concrete-filled FRP tubes: Behavior of circular and square columns under axial compression

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 215-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.013

Keywords

Geopolymer concrete (GPC); Fibers; Plastic deformation; Strength; Mechanical testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the axial compressive behavior of concrete filled fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tubes (CFFTs), prepared using either ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete (OPCC) or fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (GPC). Thirty-six CFFTs were tested under axial compression. The effects of the type of the concrete and FRP tube material, number of FRP layers used in the FRP tube, and specimen cross-sectional shape were studied. The results suggest that the axial stress-strain behavior of CFFTs is affected by the type of concrete, with GPCFFTs developing a similar strength enhancement ratio to but a lower axial strain enhancement ratio than the companion OPCCFETs. Owing to the higher shrinkage of the OPCC, OPCCFFTs exhibit a plateau at the transition region of their stress-strain curves, which is not seen in GPCFFTs. At a similar confinement ratio, OPCCFFTs confined with different fibers exhibit comparable strength and strain enhancement ratios, whereas slight differences are seen among GPCFFTs manufactured with different fibers. The strength and strain enhancement coefficients of both OPCC- and GPC-FFTs decrease with an increase in the thickness of FRP tube. An accurate model that was originally proposed to predict the ultimate conditions of FRP-confined conventional concrete was modified to enable the application of the model to circular and square GPCFFTs, and it is presented in the final part of the paper. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available