Evaluation of the Whole Body Spine Response to Sub-Injurious Vertical Loading

It is critical to understand the relationship between under-body blast (UBB) loading and occupant response to provide optimal protection to the warfighter from serious injuries, many of which affect the spine. Previous studies have examined component and whole body response to accelerative based UBB loading. While these studies both informed injury prediction efforts and examined the shortcomings of traditional anthropomorphic test devices in the evaluation of human injury, few studies provide response data against which future models could be compared and evaluated. The current study examines four different loading conditions on a seated occupant that demonstrate the effects of changes in the floor, seat, personal protective equipment (PPE), and reclined posture on whole body post-mortem human surrogate (PMHS) spinal response in a sub-injurious loading range. Twelve PMHS were tested across floor velocities and time-to-peak (TTP) that ranged from 4.0 to 8.0 m/s and 2 to 5 ms, respectively. To focus on sub-injurious response, seat velocities were kept at 4.0 m/s and TTP ranged from 5 to 35 ms. Results demonstrated that spine response is sensitive to changes in TTP and the presence of PPE. However, spine response is largely insensitive to changes in floor loading. Data from these experiments have also served to develop response corridors that can be used to assess the performance and predictive capability of new test models used as human surrogates in high-rate vertical loading experiments.

Automated summary

The study focuses on the spinal response of seated occupants to under-body blast loading, finding that the spine response is sensitive to changes in time-to-peak and the presence of personal protective equipment, but largely insensitive to changes in floor loading. Data from the experiments were used to develop response corridors for evaluating new test models used as human surrogates in high-rate vertical loading experiments.